Did anyone else see on GMA this morning, the ‘competition’ between different cosmetics based on price? If you missed it, you can see it here: just click on the “Does High Cost Mean High Quality?” video link.
What surprised me was how close the colors matched in their cheap, mid and high range category.  The colors looked sooo similar. But we all know that almost all high end cosmetics have a cheaper counterpart (i.e. Lancome & L’oreal).
But what got me was in how they did it. The poor reporter had to apply the cheap and mid range cosmetics by herself.  But for the high end range? A makeup artist did it for her. Now don’t you think that automatically changes the look?  As in a better application, I’m sure more makeup brushes were used, and a more professional look was achieved.  Don’t you think? Why didn’t they have her apply the high range line herself as well?  Of course, the high end range looked better. More coverage on the skin, brighter colors on the blush and lips. The reporter did say that she noticed a considerable difference in the feel of the high end products, but the look? Is it really that much different?
So what’s the real story? Hmmm.. let me guess.  Were the products that much better because a pro applied it? Or because the products were really that much better?
What do you think?

Unless otherwise specified, a product review is based on a product sent by a representative of the company.

The GMA’s Makeup Test: HIgh quality or high cost? by Elke Von Freudenberg [ Blog ], unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.